Current Portfolio Snapshot: AI Infrastructure, Robotics, Energy and Crypto Yield
This note summarizes my current portfolio from recent account screenshots. I am using rounded figures and public-facing language because the goal is not to show every balance, but to document the themes, concentration, and risks I need to monitor.
Snapshot overview
The screenshots show a portfolio spread across listed equities and several crypto accounts. One equity account is around EUR 16.2k. The crypto screenshots show separate balances around EUR 4.6k, EUR 5.5k, and USD 5.6k.
I do not combine these into one precise total here because the accounts use different base currencies, crypto prices move quickly, and screenshots can overlap with hidden balances or pending transfers.
Main public-market themes
The equity side is mostly thematic. ASML represents semiconductor equipment and advanced manufacturing. GE Vernova reflects grid, power, and electrification demand. Oklo adds nuclear optionality. Serve Robotics and Tesla sit in the robotics, autonomy, and physical AI theme.
Circle adds exposure to stablecoin and digital asset payment infrastructure. These are high-growth areas, but many of them can be volatile because expectations are already important to valuation.
Main crypto themes
The crypto side appears concentrated in Akash Network and PENDLE, with additional BTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, and a small NFP balance visible. Akash fits the decentralized compute and AI infrastructure narrative. PENDLE fits crypto yield markets and interest-rate-style product design.
Crypto positions require extra attention to liquidity, token unlocks, protocol risk, smart contract risk, exchange risk, and whether the narrative is supported by durable usage.
Risk observations
The biggest portfolio risk is concentration. Many positions depend on similar macro conditions: risk appetite, AI infrastructure demand, liquidity, and market willingness to pay for long-duration growth.
Another risk is account fragmentation. Holding assets across several platforms can be useful, but it also makes portfolio-level risk harder to see unless I maintain one consolidated monthly review.
How I want to review it
My review process should focus on thesis quality instead of daily profit and loss. For each major position, I want to write the reason for ownership, the failure condition, the sizing rule, and the next review trigger.
This article is a personal journal snapshot. It is not a recommendation to copy the portfolio or buy any of the assets mentioned.